Showfeed vs ShowingTime for showing feedback

ShowingTime is a showing scheduling platform that also requests feedback. Showfeed does not schedule anything; it exists only to collect feedback and turn it into a seller-facing report. Most agents who use both keep ShowingTime for access and add Showfeed for the feedback and the seller report.

Last updated

These are not the same category

ShowingTime's job is access: getting a buyer's agent into a property at a time the seller agreed to, with confirmations flowing to everyone involved. Feedback is a feature attached to that workflow, sent after an appointment it already knows about.

Showfeed's job is the feedback itself and what happens to it afterward. It does not book appointments and does not manage access. It takes showings that already happened, from whatever system booked them, and turns responses into a live report your seller reads.

That distinction is why 'switching' is usually the wrong frame. If you are on ShowingTime through your MLS, you are very likely staying on it for scheduling regardless of what you use for feedback.

Side by side

Verified against both products' public documentation in August 2026. ShowingTime's exact feature set varies by MLS and brokerage agreement, so check yours.

ShowfeedShowingTime
Primary jobShowing feedback and the seller reportShowing scheduling and access coordination
Schedules showingsNo, by designYes, this is the core product
Feedback form lengthThree taps, no typing requiredConfigurable form, typically longer
Buyer's agent needs an accountNo, the link opens the formAgents generally work inside their ShowingTime account
Seller-facing live reportYes, branded to you, updated per showingReports are available to agents; seller-facing presentation varies
Voice reply transcriptionYes, an agent can reply with a voice noteNot a documented feature
AvailabilityDirect signup, any US agentTypically provided through your MLS or brokerage
Works alongside the otherYes, forward your confirmation emailsYes, Showfeed does not touch scheduling

The difference that actually shows up in your response rate

Both products send a feedback request after a showing. The gap is in what the request asks the responder to do.

A buyer's agent gets nothing from answering and carries some risk if they write something quotable, so the response rate is set almost entirely by effort. A link that opens directly to three tappable questions is a different proposition from a form reached through an account, and that difference is where most of the gap comes from.

The second gap is the destination. Feedback that lands in the listing agent's inbox needs someone to compile it before a seller ever benefits. Feedback that assembles itself into a live, anonymized report is doing work while you are at a closing.

Where ShowingTime is the better answer

If the thing costing you time is coordinating access, ShowingTime is the category leader and nothing on this site competes with it. Appointment routing, confirmation flows, lockbox and access instructions, seller approval rules: that is a genuinely hard problem it has been solving at scale for years.

If it comes through your MLS at no additional cost, keep it. Replacing it to solve a feedback problem would be paying with something that works to fix something adjacent.

And if your feedback response rates through ShowingTime are already good, there is no argument here worth acting on. The case for adding anything only exists if requests are going out and answers are not coming back.

Running both

This is what most Showfeed users do, so it is worth spelling out rather than leaving as an implication.

  • Scheduling stays where it is

    Nothing changes about how agents book time at your listing. Showfeed has no scheduling surface to conflict with.

  • Showings arrive by email forwarding

    Forward your showing confirmation emails to a per-listing address and the showing is created automatically, which means feedback requests do not depend on you remembering.

  • Turn off the duplicate request

    If your scheduling platform also sends a feedback request, disable one of them. Two separate requests for the same showing is the fastest way to be ignored by both.

  • The seller only ever sees one thing

    One live report, one weekly summary, branded to you. That is the part of this your seller experiences, and it is the part they remember at relist time.

Questions

Does Showfeed replace ShowingTime?

No. ShowingTime schedules showings and manages access; Showfeed collects feedback and produces the seller report. They solve different problems and most people who use Showfeed keep their scheduling platform unchanged.

Can I use Showfeed if my showings are booked through ShowingTime?

Yes, and that is the common setup. Forward your showing confirmation emails to the per-listing address and each showing is captured automatically, so nothing depends on manual entry.

Why would I add a second tool for feedback?

Only if requests are going out and answers are not coming back, or if compiling responses into something your seller can read is eating your time. If neither is true, adding a tool will not help.

How much does ShowingTime cost?

It is typically provided through your MLS or brokerage rather than bought directly, so the answer depends on your market and we will not print a number that is wrong somewhere. Check with your MLS.

How current is this comparison?

Verified against both products' public materials in August 2026 and re-checked quarterly. If something here is out of date, tell us at hello@showfeed.app and we will correct it.

Keep reading

This is what your seller would see

A live report that updates after every showing: how many agents responded, how interested buyers were, and where the price is landing. Anonymous, branded to you.

See a sample report